Logo: to the web site of the Swedish Defence University

fhs.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An investigation of improving validity in upper limb measurements for people with tetraplegia using construct specification equations
Centre for Advanced Reconstruction of Extremities, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Mölndal, Mölndal, Sweden, (SWE); Department of Hand Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, (SWE).
Division of Safety and Transport, Measurement Science and Technology Unit, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Gothenburg, Sweden, (SWE).
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand, (NZL).
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia, (AUS); Epworth Health Care, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, (AUS).
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Scientific Reports, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 15, article id 28468Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this paper is two-fold: to investigate development of a Construct Specification Equation (CSE) for UL task difficulty, , and a CSE for person UL ability, , in support of the validity of these two constructs. Measurements of UL task difficulty, , and person UL ability, were derived from applying the Rasch model on the Tetraplegia Upper Limb Activity Questionnaire (TUAQ). The formulations of CSEs as explanations of the two constructs were done using Principal Component Regression (PCR). The CSE for UL task difficulty, , was to a large degree explained by the number of joints involved and the CSE for person UL ability, , was dominated by grasp-related variables. Pearson coefficients of 0.94 and 0.73 were obtained between UL task difficulty and UL person ability from the CSE, respectively, when correlated with each empirical measure. The present work has both explored and extended the methodology for using more qualitative explanatory variables. Specifically, for UL measurements for people with tetraplegia a good CSE for task difficulty, , supports the validity of TUAQ when measuring person UL ability. Additionally, the CSE formulated for person ability, , can be used both for validation purposes as well as a clinical tool.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 15, article id 28468
Keywords [en]
Task difficulty, Person ability, Construct specification equation, Validation, Rasch analysis, TUAQ
National Category
Health Sciences Clinical Medicine
Research subject
Leadership and Command & Control
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-14266DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-98626-4OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-14266DiVA, id: diva2:2020001
Available from: 2025-12-09 Created: 2025-12-09 Last updated: 2025-12-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Melin, Jeanette

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Melin, Jeanette
By organisation
Leadership and Command & Control Division Karlstad
In the same journal
Scientific Reports
Health SciencesClinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 81 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf