Logo: to the web site of the Swedish Defence University

fhs.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fair Assessment of Logical Ability in Military Selection: A Rasch Analysis of a Paper Fold and Cut Test
Swedish Defence University, Institutionen för ledarskap och ledning, Leadership and Command & Control Division Karlstad.ORCID iD: 0009-0008-9632-3846
Swedish Defence University, Institutionen för ledarskap och ledning, Leadership and Command & Control Division Karlstad.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3700-3921
2025 (English)In: SAGE Open, E-ISSN 2158-2440, Vol. 15, no 3Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Intelligence tests often play a vital role in selection processes across various domains, including those for basic military training. However, intelligence tests have also been criticized for being unfair and biased. The Swedish Enlistment Battery (SEB) serves as a tool for evaluating cognitive aptitude and is currently undergoing updates to ensure robust measurement properties and equity in selection for conscription. This article introduces a new addition to the SEB, termed the Paper Fold and Cut (PFC) test. The PFC test initially comprised 14 items intended to assess logical reasoning with visuospatial elements by presenting participants with images of folded and cut paper, requiring them to discern the correct outcome upon unfolding. Data was gathered from individuals (N = 1,262) undergoing testing for conscription (71% men, 91% aged 17–19 years, 15% voluntary and 12% with immigrant background). Employing Rasch analysis, when two misfitting items were removed the PFC test demonstrated sound measurement properties; acceptable fit statistics, support for unidimensional trait, absence of differential item functioning (DIF) and local dependence (LD), as well as adequate targeting and person separation index (PSI). Consequently, the PFC test emerges as a robust and unbiased tool for assessing logical ability among conscripts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 15, no 3
Keywords [en]
cognitive abilities, logical abilities, intelligence, Rasch, personnel selection, invariance, fair testing, bias in testing
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Research subject
Leadership and Command & Control
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-14100DOI: 10.1177/21582440251372266OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-14100DiVA, id: diva2:2001202
Available from: 2025-09-25 Created: 2025-09-25 Last updated: 2025-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Wahlkrantz, EmelieMelin, Jeanette

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wahlkrantz, EmelieMelin, Jeanette
By organisation
Leadership and Command & Control Division Karlstad
In the same journal
SAGE Open
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 131 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf