Logo: to the web site of the Swedish Defence University

fhs.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validating a shortened version of the Nordic safety climate questionnaire (NOSACQ) on a military population
Swedish Defence University, Institutionen för ledarskap och ledning, Leadership and Command & Control Division Stockholm.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0394-9724
2025 (English)In: Safety Science, ISSN 0925-7535, E-ISSN 1879-1042, Vol. 191, article id 106946Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study has been to develop a shortened version of NOSACQ-50 using previously collected military data. NOSACQ-50 has previously been tested and validated with data from the Swedish Armed Forces, published in three separate studies. The three sets of data from these previous studies were used for further testing. Classical test theory and item response theory were used to reduce the items included in the NOSACQ-50 questionnaire. The results indicate that the military population perceives safety differently, thus making items included in shorter versions of NOSACQ developed with civilian data, underperform with military data. The 50 items included in NOSACQ could be reduced to 35/34 items. There are several limitations to this study; one limitation is that the NOSACQ-35 questionnaire was only used within the existing NOSACQ-50 framework, making accuracy improvements impossible to detect. Further research should focus on an experimental design with a randomized experimental group using the NOSACQ-35 and a randomized control group using the NOSACQ-50 questionnaire. However, the NOSACQ-35 was tested within the full NOSACQ-50 framework, claims regarding improved usability and reliability should be interpreted with caution. Future research should evaluate the NOSACQ-35 as a standalone instrument.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 191, article id 106946
Keywords [en]
Safety climate, Questionnaire development, Reliability, Military, Obedience
National Category
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Leadership and Command & Control
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-14023DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106946OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-14023DiVA, id: diva2:1987147
Available from: 2025-08-05 Created: 2025-08-05 Last updated: 2025-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Schüler, Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schüler, Martin
By organisation
Leadership and Command & Control Division Stockholm
In the same journal
Safety Science
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 101 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf