This study examines whether Edward N. Luttwak’s theory of coup d’états can explain the outcome of twomodern cases, Egypt 2013 and Myanmar 2021. Previous research shows that rarely has Luttwaks theorybeen utilized in a modern setting, a research gap this study aims to fill.The study uses a theory-testing, comparative case study design, focusing on transitioning from tacticalsuccess towards regime stabilization. By operationalizing Luttwaks theory into observable and measurableindicators the study can systematically analyse each case.The chosen theory, first written almost 60 years ago, rewritten in 2016 to encompass the last 60 years ofdevelopment. The findings suggest that Luttwaks theory can adequately account for the initial success ofmilitary takeovers, but falls short in explaining what contributes to long lasting stabilization. In both of thecases the military attempted the coup with tactical success. But where Egypt succeeded in creating loyaltyand stability within its country the Myanmar military failed leading to instability and civil-war.The findings hold relevance in the field of military science, emphasizing the military-civil relationshipwithin a society and understanding the early signs of political malpractice.