Logo: to the web site of the Swedish Defence University

fhs.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Social reintegration of former al-Shabaab militants: How formal channels help mitigate threat perceptions
Swedish Defence University, Department of War Studies, Joint Warfare Division.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7634-8394
Department of Government, University of Essex, UK, (GBR).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1921-5242
2025 (English)In: Journal of Peace Research, ISSN 0022-3433, E-ISSN 1460-3578, Vol. 62, no 6, p. 1820-1838Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

What drives host community preferences towards the reintegration of former Islamist militants? While recognizing the importance of host communities in the reintegration process, empirical evidence on the factors influencing community support for reintegrating former Islamist militants remains limited. We hypothesized that community preferences are shaped along the perceived threat level influenced by three factors: organizational profile, identity traits, and reintegration channels. We empirically examined these using a conjoint survey involving Somali civilians from three cities with disarmament, demobilization and reintegration centers and a separate survey of former al-Shabaab disarmament, demobilization and reintegration graduates. Our results showed that security-related attributes, such as involvement in killings, recruitment history and unit association wielded a substantial influence on threat perceptions. Heightened threat perceptions played a key role in shaping wartime preferences, explaining how host communities categorize security threats. Notably, our results underscored a community preference for disarmament, demobilization and reintegration program graduates and for those granted government amnesty over ex-fighters reintegrated through traditional channels, highlighting the efficacy of formal reintegration channels in managing community threat perceptions compared to informal pathways.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 62, no 6, p. 1820-1838
Keywords [en]
Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR), preventing/countering violent extremism (P/CVE), wartime preference formation, Islamist militants, al-Shabaab, threat perceptions
National Category
War, Crisis, and Security Studies Political Science
Research subject
War Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-13561DOI: 10.1177/00223433241303285OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-13561DiVA, id: diva2:1944345
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2015-03476Available from: 2025-03-13 Created: 2025-03-13 Last updated: 2025-11-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1401 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1401 kBChecksum SHA-512
3f8540303ba93766dbecdeb52c94ab5898b3beeb257b4bbcc19a36ffbbfe4093c3c8efc981796caa8cf61efe8f47616a761722999b2eb9fe34d45405a0d5125f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Gelot, Linnéa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gelot, LinnéaKhadka, Prabin
By organisation
Joint Warfare Division
In the same journal
Journal of Peace Research
War, Crisis, and Security StudiesPolitical Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 96 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf