Logo: to the web site of the Swedish Defence University

fhs.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gendered bordering practices in Swedish and Russian foreign and security policy
Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, Australia, (AUS).ORCID iD: /0000-0001-7023-2155
Utrikespolitiska Institutet (UI), The Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden, (SWE).
2019 (English)In: Political Geography, ISSN 0962-6298, E-ISSN 1873-5096, Vol. 71, p. 56-66Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In recent years, border tensions have characterised Swedish-Russian security relations in the form of simulated strikes and military exercises in the Baltic Sea region. In this article, we show that while security tensions ‘at the border’ may be present, a complex process of gendered bordering underwrites Swedish and Russian foreign and security policy, seemingly pitching a progressivist and feminist Swedish foreign and security profile against Russian security performances that exhibit overt masculinist power. The tensions between Russia and Sweden appear imbued with gendered power relations. To analyse these forms of gendered bordering, we engage with Critical Border Studies by understanding bordering as practice, rather than theorising borders as ‘static dividing lines’ and by drawing on feminist security studies by examining bordering practices as constructions of masculinism, sexuality, and as a performance of gendered states. We argue that the gendered dynamics that inform state bordering practices are layered, complex, and contradictory. Rather than two opposing but consistent positions, we identify tensions and ambiguities within these subjectivities and examine how gendered bordering practices shape and militarise the state.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 71, p. 56-66
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-13503DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.02.012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-13503DiVA, id: diva2:1938068
Available from: 2025-02-17 Created: 2025-02-17 Last updated: 2025-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Agius, Christine

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Agius, Christine
In the same journal
Political Geography
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 114 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf