Logo: to the web site of the Swedish Defence University

By using a frame analysis of U.S. media reports of U.S. servicemembers perpetrating sexual violence against Japanese civilians, this thesis demonstrates how women and girls and their security are considered worthy sacrifices for state security in the media. The analysis results find that the general narrative of U.S. media and military regarding the U.S. perpetrated sexual violence in Japan is that of blame-shifting, essentially removing the fault and responsibility of these incidents away from the U.S. military and the U.S. at large. This thesis argues that this has led to multiple outcomes. First, the U.S. military's primary focus is preserving its military alliance and the subsequent increased regional security with Japan. This subsequently leads to women and girls not being considered important enough for fundamental structural change in either how the U.S. military operates or an expansion of the definition of security. Secondly, the results also showcased signs of an imperialistic mindset regarding Japanese society and the women within that society. By ignoring the Western stereotypes and norms of racialised sexism that put these Japanese women and girls under additional threats, the imperialistic belief again shifts blame away from the West and onto the victims and Japan. With these findings, this thesis contributes to the discussion regarding security and our understanding of gendered violence during peacetime.