Logo: to the web site of the Swedish Defence University

fhs.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Military English language education: a scoping review of 30 years of research
Department of English, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, (SWE).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9268-6481
Swedish Defence University, Department of Military History, Language Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8856-8298
Swedish Defence University, Department of Military History, Language Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0451-7790
2025 (English)In: Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, ISSN 1750-1229, E-ISSN 1750-1237, Vol. 19, no 5, p. 433-451Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose

This scoping review investigates research on Military English (ME) language and teaching over the past three decades. Despite the growing need for English proficiency among military personnel due to increases in international joint operations [Niculescu, B.-O., G. Obilişteanu, and I. A. Dragomir. 2019. “Contribution of Foreign Languages to Building the Professional Career of the Land Forces Academy Cadets.” Land Forces Academy Review 24 (3): 213–219], ME as a field of study lacks comprehensive research. The features and patterns of ME and effective approaches towards ME language instruction remain insufficiently explored.

Methodology

The study employs a scoping review approach [Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32] to map the current state of ME research, including language features, themes, and pedagogical approaches. The study initially identified 1778 articles across major databases. This initial data set was then examined and narrowed down to 34 articles based on the inclusion criteria.

Findings and Originality

The findings indicate a diverse range of research themes and learner background within ME education, including motivation, needs analysis, and the description of Military English itself. The research also highlights the distinct domain of ME and the necessity of efficient, relevant, and tailored language instruction to meet the practical ME needs of learners. It also points out the limited number of studies that adequately evaluate the effectiveness of various teaching approaches. The study emphasizes the importance of alignment among the various stakeholders and calls for more rigorous research in the field.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 19, no 5, p. 433-451
Keywords [en]
Military English, English for specific purposes, English as a second language, scoping review, interoperability, language education
National Category
Specific Languages
Research subject
Military History
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-13233DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2024.2370986OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-13233DiVA, id: diva2:1914492
Projects
Projektpengar från Krigsvetenskap på FHSAvailable from: 2024-11-19 Created: 2024-11-19 Last updated: 2025-10-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Vance, MichaelaNilsson, Diana

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Siegel, AkiVance, MichaelaNilsson, Diana
By organisation
Language Centre
In the same journal
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 197 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf