This thesis investigates how Sweden and Nato frame the cyber domain and what implications these frames can have for the strategic manoeuvre of Sweden as a new member. The study applies van Hulst and Yanows dynamic framing theory to an analysis of key policy papers and doctrines of Sweden and Nato. The analysis shows that Swedish frames are characterized by normative stability and societal resilience while Nato, on a higher level, frames the cyber domain as a military strategic tool for operations. These differences create a tension between normative prudence and operational freedom of action. The thesis argues that this difference is structural rather than temporary and demonstrates how strategic culture illuminates small-state alliance behaviour and shapes the opportunities for Swedish cyber deterrence within Nato. These findings contribute to the understanding of strategic planning within Nato’s cyber defence.