Logo: to the web site of the Swedish Defence University

fhs.se
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Critical military subjects? Reflections on critical thinking and thinking critically in professional military education
School of International Relations, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom, (GBR).
Institute of Security and Global Affairs, Leiden University, Den Haag, Netherlands, (NLD).
Swedish Defence University, Department of War Studies, Strategy Division.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9438-0240
Swedish Defence University, Department of War Studies, Land Operations Division.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5502-6775
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Critical Military Studies, ISSN 2333-7486, E-ISSN 2333-7494, Vol. 12, no 1, p. 63-83Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Professional military education (PME) has so far attracted only limited attention within critical military studies (CMS). This contribution provides an opening for further engagement with this important aspect of modern militaries. Specifically, we zoom into an increasingly central aspect in the provision of PME: boosting critical thinking within the armed forces. Yet what it means to foster ‘critical thinking’ within military institutions is contested. To reflect on this aspect and its importance in warranting CMS’s attention, we engage in a conversation that brings together voices from former and current PME educators with experience across different PME institutions (UK/US/Sweden). By juxtaposing their distinct viewpoints, this intervention argues that PME is a site to interrogate a key question of CMS, namely the extent to which CMS scholars ought to relate to military power. We argue that a certain level of proximity, even embeddness as in our case, can offer a vantage point to illuminate the limits and possibilities for critique within military organizations and the silencing effects of military power. These silences manifest in the limits of critique, which we, as PME educators, have encountered in our educational practices, showing that proximity is not without risks and necessitating continued reflexive scrutiny.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2026. Vol. 12, no 1, p. 63-83
Keywords [en]
Professional military education, critical military studies, Civil-Military Relations, military power
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Research subject
War Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-14490DOI: 10.1080/23337486.2025.2607776OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-14490DiVA, id: diva2:2038806
Available from: 2026-02-16 Created: 2026-02-16 Last updated: 2026-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Danielsson, AnnaLarsson, SebastianWibben, Annick T.R.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Danielsson, AnnaLarsson, SebastianWibben, Annick T.R.
By organisation
Strategy DivisionLand Operations DivisionFunctions and Perspective Division
In the same journal
Critical Military Studies
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 244 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf