Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What can we learn from enterprise architecture models?: An experiment comparing models and documents for capability development
Swedish Institute of Computer Science (SICS).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2017-7914
Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI).
Swedish National Defence College, Department of Military Studies, Military-Technology Division.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4376-9800
2016 (English)In: Software and Systems Modeling, ISSN 1619-1366, E-ISSN 1619-1374Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Enterprise architecture (EA) has been established as a discipline to cope with the complex interactions of business operations and technology. Models, i.e., formal descriptions in terms of diagrams and views, are at the heart of the approach. Though it is widely thought that such architecture models can contribute to improved understanding and decision making, this proposition has not rigorously been tested. This article describes an experiment conducted with a real EA model and corresponding real traditional documents, investigating whether the model or the documents lead to better and faster understanding. Understanding is interesting to study, as it is a prerequisite to other EA uses. The subjects (N = 98) were officer cadets, and the experiment was carried out using a comprehensive description of military Close Air Support capability either (1) in the form of a MODAF model or (2) in the form of traditional documents. Based on the results, the model seems to lead to better, though not faster, understanding.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2016.
Keyword [en]
enterprise architecture, MODAF, model-based capability development, experiment, models versus documents
National Category
Information Systems
Research subject
Militärteknik
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6145DOI: 10.1007/s10270-016-0535-zOAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-6145DiVA: diva2:932830
Available from: 2016-06-02 Created: 2016-06-02 Last updated: 2016-10-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Franke, UlrikSigholm, Johan
By organisation
Military-Technology Division
In the same journal
Software and Systems Modeling
Information Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 361 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf