Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The long and winding road... to success?: Unit Peace Operation Effectiveness (UPOE) and the success of the NATO mission in Afghanistan
Department of Peace and Conflict Research , Uppsala University.
2013 (English)In: Defense and Security Analysis, ISSN 1475-1798, E-ISSN 1475-1801, Vol. 29, no 2, 128-140 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Why does peacekeeping sometimes fail? How can effective peacekeepers increase the likelihood of success of a mission? The two main flaws in the current evaluations of peace operations are that they mainly rely on already concluded missions and that they make use of indicators that do not reveal micro-level dynamics. This article introduces an analytical framework relating the effectiveness of soldiers to their actual impact in their area of operation in a peace operation. The framework is called “unit peace operation effectiveness” (UPOE). Focusing on soldiers in peace operations, this article shows that: different units behave differently; emphasize different aspects of the mandate; and are effective in different ways. Ultimately, this has an actual impact on the end-state of the mission. It relies on and adapts classic security studies works to theoretically enrich the peacekeeping literature. The model is tested in an illustrative case study based on ethnographic work on French and Italian units in Afghanistan between 2008 and 2010.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 29, no 2, 128-140 p.
Keyword [en]
military effectiveness, peace operations, mission success, French army, Italian army, Afghanistan, ethnography
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-5207DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2013.787793OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-5207DiVA: diva2:780527
Available from: 2015-01-14 Created: 2015-01-14 Last updated: 2015-05-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14751798.2013.787793#tabModule

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ruffa, Chiara
In the same journal
Defense and Security Analysis
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 38 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf