Logo: to the web site of the Swedish Defence University

fhs.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Small States Defying Great Powers: A qualitative case study of Lithuania’s foreign policy from a status-seeking perspective
Swedish Defence University.
2023 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Why has Lithuania chosen to forge closer ties with Taiwan while assuming the role of a vocal criticiser of China? Research on small-state foreign policy has highlighted weaknesses as the primary determinant of small-state behaviour. This thesis applies a newly developed theory of status-seeking to gain a deeper understanding of Lithuania’s foreign policy decisions through the concept of status. Based on statements of the foreign policy elite and interviews with civil servants of the Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the thesis concludes that Lithuania’s policy on China and Taiwan can be understood as a means to seek status as a good power. The thesis suggests that Lithuania’s stance on China and Taiwan has allowed the small Baltic nation to establish a distinctive position and emulate the behaviour of status superiors. Although these findings are limited to Lithuania, they are not trivial because they expand the understanding of an overlooked aspect of international relations, namely status as a motivational factor in small states’ foreign affairs. This thesis’s empirical contribution helps to understand small states’ foreign policy choices. It adds to the nascent literature on small states’ status-seeking, which argues that smaller states are more status concerned than international relations scholars have commonly acknowledged.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. , p. 41
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-11418OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-11418DiVA, id: diva2:1732897
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2023-02-13 Created: 2023-01-31 Last updated: 2023-02-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

By organisation
Swedish Defence University
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1037 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf