Logo: to the web site of the Swedish Defence University

fhs.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The limitations of strategic narratives: The Sino-American struggle over the meaning of COVID-19
Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Political Science Section, Sektionen för säkerhetespolitik och strategi.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7495-055X
Department of Economic History and International Relations, Stockholm University, (SWE).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9897-9891
2021 (English)In: Contemporary Security Policy, ISSN 1352-3260, E-ISSN 1743-8764, Vol. 42, no 4, p. 415-449Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Recent research has explored how the Sino-American narrative struggle around COVID-19 might affect power shift dynamics and world order. An underlying assumption is that states craft strategic narratives in attempts to gain international support for their understandings of reality. This article evaluates such claims taking a mixed-methods approach. It analyzes American and Chinese strategic narratives about the pandemic, and their global diffusion and resonance in regional states that are important to the U.S.-led world order: Australia, India, South Korea, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. While the article confirms that strategic narratives remain a highly popular policy instrument, it argues that their efficacy appears limited. Overall, the five states in question either ignored the Sino-American narrative power battle by disseminating their own strategic narratives, or they engaged in “narrative hedging.” Moreover, even China’s narrative entrepreneurship was enabled and constrained by pre-existing master narratives integral to the current U.S.-led world order.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 42, no 4, p. 415-449
Keywords [en]
political science, international relations, China, COVID-19, power shift, strategic narratives, United States, world order
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Research subject
Statsvetenskap med inriktning mot strategi och säkerhetspolitik
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-10349DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2021.1984725ISI: 000702690800001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-10349DiVA, id: diva2:1600380
Funder
Swedish Armed Forces, StormaktsrivalitetMarianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation, MMW 2016.0036Available from: 2021-10-04 Created: 2021-10-04 Last updated: 2022-05-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2965 kB)211 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 2965 kBChecksum SHA-512
7502a16f096ecbe73d93bdf2e56e087fdb4c3c99079151d2084215860d98bd0e819019c991e4f426c35604e0f25aa55c628412e53b4937e11e699138ddeaea68
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Hagström, Linus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hagström, LinusGustafsson, Karl
By organisation
Sektionen för säkerhetespolitik och strategi
In the same journal
Contemporary Security Policy
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 242 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 479 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf