Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Managing Crises Collaboratively: Prospects and Problems - A Systematic Literature Review
Uppsala University, Sweden.
Swedish Defence University, Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership (ISSL), Centre for Societal Security.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5044-6495
Uppsala University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0407-3939
Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
2018 (English)In: Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, ISSN 2398-4910, Vol. 1, no 4, p. 257-271Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Effective interorganizational collaboration is a pivotal ingredient of any community or nation’s capacity to prepare for and bounce back from disruptive crisis events. The booming research field of collaborative public management (CPM) has been yielding important insights into such collaboration that as yet await transfer to the study of crisis management (CM). Also, we argue that the general CPM literature has not sufficiently addressed the distinctive collaboration challenges involved in coping with crises. This article bridges this twofold gap. Based on a systematic review of prior research in collaborative CM, this study identifies dominant areas of theoretical emphasis, methodological practices, and patterns of empirical enquiry. The article highlights areas where CPM research has potential to further inform the understanding of collaborative CM, including performance, success factors, managerial skills, and learning. The article then identifies five properties associated with CM—uncertainty, leadership, magnitude, costs, and urgency—which deserve further analysis to advance the understanding of the application of CPM principles and strategies. We conclude with outlining a research agenda and offering a set of testable propositions aimed at investigating the likelihood of effective collaboration in different types of crises and as expected indifferent CM paradigms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Vol. 1, no 4, p. 257-271
Keywords [en]
collaborative governance, crisis management
National Category
Public Administration Studies
Research subject
Statsvetenskap med inriktning mot krishantering och internationell samverkan
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-7188DOI: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvx018OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-7188DiVA, id: diva2:1172552
Projects
Governing for Societal Security
Funder
Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency, 2012-4945Available from: 2018-01-10 Created: 2018-01-10 Last updated: 2019-08-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

The full text will be freely available from 2020-02-11 10:14
Available from 2020-02-11 10:14

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Nohrstedt, DanielBynander, FredrikParker, Charles F.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nohrstedt, DanielBynander, FredrikParker, Charles F.
By organisation
Centre for Societal Security
Public Administration Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 448 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf