Logo: to the web site of the Swedish Defence University

fhs.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do the Good Intentions of European Human Rights Law Really Pave the Road to IHL Hell for Civilian Detainees in Occupied Territory?
International Law and Policy Institute (ILPI), NOR..
2015 (English)In: Journal of Conflict and Security Law, ISSN 1467-7954, E-ISSN 1467-7962, Vol. 20, no 1, p. 133-163Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article cautions against the notion that the good intentions of European human rights law necessarily undermine international humanitarian law. In Al-Jedda, despite some suggestions to the contrary, the European Court did not misconstrue the law of belligerent occupation. The court erred, however, in assuming that the duty of non-detention under Article 5(1) of the European Convention can only be ‘displaced’ by a counter-duty of security detention. Whereas the law of belligerent occupation does not impose such a counter-duty, it does empower the occupation authorities to detain on security grounds, and exercising this power would frustrate observing Article 5(1) and vice versa. The norm conflict was soluble, but the would-be need to modify the scope and/or content of Article 5(1) or the law of belligerent occupation, rendered the European Court ill suited for the task. Nevertheless, the court’s ruling against the UK need not mean that European occupying powers suddenly have no choice but to kill rather than detain without charge (and risk lawsuits later) when countering security threats. On the contrary, the law of belligerent occupation helps the occupiers devise Al-Jedda-compliant detention regimes. The judgment’s repercussions are direr for the internment of prisoners of war.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford, 2015. Vol. 20, no 1, p. 133-163
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Juridik med inriktning mot folkrätt
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-9422DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/kru008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-9422DiVA, id: diva2:1466550
Available from: 2020-09-11 Created: 2020-09-11 Last updated: 2021-06-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full texthttps://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article-abstract/20/1/133/809683

Authority records

Hayashi, Nobuo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hayashi, Nobuo
In the same journal
Journal of Conflict and Security Law
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 305 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf