Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Why Gender Does Not Stick: Exploring Conceptual Logics in Global Disaster Risk Reduction Policy
Försvarshögskolan, Institutionen för säkerhet, strategi och ledarskap (ISSL), Statsvetenskapliga avdelningen, Sektionen för krishantering och internationell samverkan.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-2892-7345
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Climate Hazards, Disasters, and Gender Ramifications / [ed] Kinnvall, Catarina & Rydstrom, Helle, London: Routledge, 2019, 1st, s. 88-124Kapittel i bok, del av antologi (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

The chapter is an analysis of the Sendai Framework for action; the central policy document in the global field of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR). Since this Framework sets the agenda for the wider field of DRR practice across the globe, it is important to scrutinise for anyone interested in problems of gender-based disaster inequality. The Sendai Framework acknowledges issues of gender inequality yet, as discussed in this chapter, does so in a rather limited and somewhat problematic way. To understand the shortcomings the analysis makes use of Carol Bacchi’s “What’s the Problem Represented to Be?” (WPR) approach to policy analysis. With help of this analytical tool,  two conceptual logics are identified in the Framework that prevent full incorporation of a gender perspective. Firstly, a relief logic assumes a temporality of acuteness and prescribes male-dominated professional domains as experts. This makes a political analysis of gender inequality unintelligible. The relief logic also renders silent political solutions to alter gender inequalities. Secondly, a techno-managerial logic proposes technical and managerial solutions to problems of disaster risk. This rewrites solutions to structural inequalities as problems that can be solved technologically and managerially – in contrast to the types of political solutions needed to alter gender inequalities.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
London: Routledge, 2019, 1st. s. 88-124
Serie
Routledge Studies in Hazards, Disaster Risk and Climate Change
Emneord [en]
Gender, Disasters, Disaster Risk Reduction, Sendai Framework for action
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Statsvetenskap med inriktning mot krishantering och internationell samverkan; Statsvetenskap med inriktning mot krishantering och internationell samverkan
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-8662OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-8662DiVA, id: diva2:1331983
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-06-27 Laget: 2019-06-27 Sist oppdatert: 2019-06-27

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Climate Hazards, Disasters, and Gender Ramifications

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Bondesson, Sara
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 67 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf