Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Approaches to Operational Art Revisited: Theoretical and Practical Implications of Methodology
Försvarshögskolan, Militärvetenskapliga institutionen (MVI), Krigsvetenskapliga avdelningen (KVA), Sektionen för operationskonst (KV Opkonst).ORCID-id: 0000-0003-1653-3787
2016 (engelsk)Inngår i: 21st International Command and Control Reserach and Technology Symposium (ICCRTS): C2 in a Complex Connected Battlespace, International Command and Control Institute , 2016, Vol. Topic 5, s. 1-32, artikkel-id 47Konferansepaper, Publicerat paper (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

U.S. doctrines have introduced a third approach within Operational Art, called the design approach, which has evoked military professional and academic debate as well as influenced NATO doctrines. Allied Joint Doctrine for Operational-level Planning (AJP 5) states that a Force Commander should choose one out of three approaches when conducting Operational Art and conducting operational planning: a traditional (causalist), a systemic or a design approach. The difference between the causalist- and the systemic- approach concerns the clash between reductionism and holism, but the difference between the design- and the systemic- approach is methodologically vague. Hence the following question concerning methodology and Operational Art arises:

What methodological implications could constitute an argument for choosing the design approach when conducting Operational Art within a battlespace?

Neither NATO doctrine, planning framework nor previous research offer any explicit methodological argument for choosing, or preferring, the design- over the systemic- approach. This article concludes that one possible argument for preferring a design approach is adherence to value-focused thinking, but this requires that the Force Commander can and is willing to focus on stakeholders’ values within the battlespace. This conclusion is implied by two methodological implications identified and discussed in this article. If the design approach is to be a relevant option, then further conceptual development, experimentation and education is required. To conclude, NATO should review the description of their approaches within Operational Art since the argument for preferring one approach over another is lacking and this could hamper the Force Commander’s management of the battlespace.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
International Command and Control Institute , 2016. Vol. Topic 5, s. 1-32, artikkel-id 47
Emneord [en]
Design approach, Methodology, Operational Art, Operations planning, Value-focused thinking, Battlespace management
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Krigsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6407OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-6407DiVA, id: diva2:1058361
Konferanse
21th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (ICCRTS), 6-8 September, London, UK
Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-12-20 Laget: 2016-12-20 Sist oppdatert: 2017-01-04bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(955 kB)128 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT02.pdfFilstørrelse 955 kBChecksum SHA-512
a63d0414586aa12cb50df943d652c44e204c4d6126a38ce79b291d21b6c99bef4e7e04b6227454365fc8124639fcfb391f6dd3e9d3af9698e3aeaea4483ddc54
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Fulltext at ICCRTS

Personposter BETA

Erdeniz, Robert

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Erdeniz, Robert
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 128 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 684 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf