Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Vilken svensk säkerhet?: En kvalitativ studie av Försvarsberedningens rapporter utifrån Köpenhamnsskolans teori om ett vidgat säkerhetbegrepp
Försvarshögskolan.
2016 (Svenska)Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen), 10 poäng / 15 hpStudentuppsats (Examensarbete)
Abstract [en]

Given the armed conflict in Ukraine, the terrorist attacks in Paris and elsewhere in Europe and the pressing issue of climate change one could argue that there are no longer room for just one sector in security studies. Based on Barry Buzan, Ole Wæver and Jaap de Wilde’s theory of securitization the aim of this paper is to study whether the Swedish Defense Committee perceive threats in any sectors other than the traditional military sector in its two reports or not and therefore also if the Defense Committee has adapted the wider security concept; and if so answer the question of what other sectors the Committee put forward in the reports. The aim is also to compare the findings in the two reports with each other to point out similarities and differences the Defense Committee’s perception of threats. The method used in this paper was an intense qualitative content analysis where the author manually examined the two reports to find indications on what kind of threats was present in the reports and how they were presented. The result of the study shows that all sectors with the exception of the societal sector in the Copenhagen School were present in the reports. An additional result of the study was that there were many similarities and differences in the reports; one similarity being that Russia was perceived as a threat in both reports while one distinction was the only in the latest report were a global financial crisis perceived as a threat.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2016. , s. 37
Nyckelord [en]
Copenhagen School, Securitization, Sweden, Defense Committee, Threat, Perception
Nyckelord [sv]
Köpenhamnsskolan, Säkerhetisering, Sverige, Försvarsberedningen, Hotuppfattning
Nationell ämneskategori
Statsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-5849OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-5849DiVA, id: diva2:899250
Ämne / kurs
Statsvetenskap med inriktning mot säkerhetspolitik
Examinatorer
Tillgänglig från: 2016-02-01 Skapad: 2016-02-01 Senast uppdaterad: 2016-02-01Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Vilken svensk säkerhet?(559 kB)433 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 559 kBChecksumma SHA-512
4148e36f05507c5bf00d8e3f7d4383585644cd179aaa58f97a05802b02be4cfaaf3853c1573cf907e147ae360d9048c69a537a946acd8822a31e3648b87839fe
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Av organisationen
Försvarshögskolan
Statsvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 433 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 1373 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf