Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The System for Crisis Management in Sweden: Collaborative, Conformist, Contradictory
Lund University, Sweden.
Försvarshögskolan, Institutionen för säkerhet, strategi och ledarskap (ISSL), CRISMART (Nationellt Centrum för Krishanteringsstudier). CNDS.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5044-6495
2017 (Engelska)Ingår i: Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction and Management / [ed] Madu, Christian N.; Kuei, Chu Hua, World Scientific, 2017, 1, s. 69-95Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Refereegranskat)
Abstract [en]

This chapter introduces the system for crisis management in Sweden. Over the last century, Sweden has gone from being a poor European backwater to being among the countries with the highest human development in the world. The droughts and harsh winters that killed thousands and drove numerous Swedes to emigrate in the past are mere distractions today and the contemporary system for crisis management is designed to deal with a broader variety of crises than the ones triggered by natural hazards. The system is based on the principles of responsibility, parity and proximity, and distributes sector and area responsibility for crisis management to numerous actors. It is built to a great extent on collaboration between these actors, which is challenging but working relatively well in the cultural context of consensus-seeking and compliance to official guidelines and accepted rules of engagement. However, the system is in itself ambiguous in the sense of distributing responsibility to all kinds of actors and then focusing almost exclusively on public actors in legislation, guidelines and practice. There is also often a gap between policy and practice concerning how area responsibility is exercised, and a lack of clarity in current sector specific legislation

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
World Scientific, 2017, 1. s. 69-95
Nyckelord [en]
Sweden, crisis, crisis management, coordination, collaboration, social capital, trust, responsibility, parity, proximity
Nationell ämneskategori
Statsvetenskap
Forskningsämne
Statsvetenskap med inriktning mot krishantering och internationell samverkan
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6087DOI: 10.1142/9789813207950_0004ISBN: 9789813207943 (tryckt)ISBN: 9789813207967 (digital)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-6087DiVA, id: diva2:919785
Forskningsfinansiär
Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap, MSB Tillgänglig från: 2016-04-15 Skapad: 2016-04-15 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-09-10

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Bynander, Fredrik

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Bynander, Fredrik
Av organisationen
CRISMART (Nationellt Centrum för Krishanteringsstudier)
Statsvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 766 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf