Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development of a short form of the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) questionnaire
Försvarshögskolan, Institutionen för ledarskap och management (ILM).ORCID-id: 0000-0001-8274-6065
2002 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Clinical Nursing, ISSN 0962-1067, E-ISSN 1365-2702, Vol. 11, nr 5, s. 681-687Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

• Patients' views on the quality of care are important and it is desirable that these can be assessed using short, yet valid and reliable instruments.

• The aim of the work reported here was to develop and test a short version of an established questionnaire: Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP).

• Patients (n=162, 79% response rate) receiving care at medical and surgical departments in two Swedish hospitals responded to the original QPP as well as to a newly developed short version. An ethical research committee approved the study.

• Pearson correlations were computed between the long and short forms and differences between means were analysed with t-tests. Reliability was estimated by computing Cronbach alpha coefficients.

• Correlations of acceptable size were found between the short form and the original QPP. The short form also had acceptable reliability coefficients.

• The strengths of the work are that the items in the short version are derived from a patient perspective and are formulated in words used by patients; the items still have a theoretical foundation, which makes the interpretation of results more meaningful; global formulations such as `What do you think about your care?' have been avoided; the short format should make the questionnaire more attractive for many patients to respond to.

• Limitations are that results indicate that the short form does not fully measure what the long form does. Therefore, when the short form is used in practice, a two-step procedure is suggested, where a follow-up is done with a selection of items from the original long form. This selection could be restricted to areas where problems may be suspected, based on the results from the short form.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2002. Vol. 11, nr 5, s. 681-687
Emneord [en]
patient perspective, patient satisfaction, quality of care, questionnaires, short form
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-2988DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00640.xISI: 000177748800016OAI: oai:DiVA.org:fhs-2988DiVA, id: diva2:574263
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-12-05 Laget: 2012-12-05 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-07bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Larsson, Gerry

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Larsson, Gerry
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Clinical Nursing

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 77 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf